Designing Offset and Axis-symmetrical Horn-Fed Cassegrain Reflectors in Antenna Magus
![]() |
Image of the Horn-Fed Axis-Symmetrical Cassegrain Antenna |
![]() |
Image of the Horn-Fed Offset Cassegrain Antenna |
In this application note we will look at the design of two types of Horn-fed Cassegrain reflector antennas available in Antenna Magus namely the axis-symmetrical - and offset Cassegrain. Antenna Magus also has a Pattern-fed Cassegrain template that allows the user to design for a custom feed beamwidth.
The benefit of using the templates with the horn feed included over the Pattern-fed Cassegrain template is that the physical model of the horn is included and taken into consideration when generating the parametric export simulation models.
User Interface
If you have no previous experience in designing an antenna with Antenna Magus it is advised that you familiarise yourself with the user interface (UI) sections and its uses. Click here for more information. The conical corrugated horn application note also demonstrates basic navigation, workflows and key concepts in Antenna Magus thoroughly and is available here.
Locating the Cassegrain Antenna Templates
To start our design process we have to locate the antennas that we want to work with. Ensure that Antenna Magus is in 'Find' mode so that the Antenna Database is visible in the 'Workspace' and type "Cassegrain" into the search bar to search for all Cassegrain antennas.
When searching the Antenna Database the antennas are grouped according to the keywords, with the most relevant antennas on top. When searching for "Cassegrain" the top group contains three antennas: the Pattern-fed Cassegrain; the Horn-fed Cassegrain and the Horn-fed offset Cassegrain. Add the Horn-fed and Horn-fed Offset Cassegrain Antennas to the 'Collection' by double-clicking or clicking the 'Add' button that is visible while hovering over the template icons.
Also add these two antennas to the info browser by clicking the 'Add to Info Browser' button on the home ribbon. Compare the two antennas in the info browser by clicking the compare button located in the info browser.
![]() |
By inspecting the information we note that the two antennas have similar specifications. However, the offset antenna offers the possibility to eliminate the aperture blockage since the feed is not placed directly between the primary and secondary reflectors. The sketch below illustrates the difference between the configuration of the standard (axis-symmetrical) Cassegrain and the offset Cassegrain antenna
![]() |
Once you have finished viewing the information switch back to the main Antenna Magus window where we can start with the design process.
Design
To be able to compare the two antennas we are going to design them both for the same operating frequency and then compare their radiation patterns.
Examples on designing the Offset Cassegrain antenna for Gain and Feed Beamwidth as well as designing for Gain and the Focal-length-to-diameter (F/D) Ratio are available by following the links below.
Design Horn-fed Axis-Symetrical Cassegrain Design Horn-fed Offset Cassegrain Design Horn-fed Offset Cassegrain Antenna for Gain and Feed Bandwidth Design Horn-fed Offset Cassegrain for F/D RatioDesign Horn-fed Axis-Symetrical Cassegrain for Operating frequency
Now click on the estimate performance button on the parameters expander to simulate the design. Once the simulation has completed navigate to the estimated performance tab to view the results (shown below).
![]() |
Design Horn-fed Offset Cassegrain Antenna for Operating frequency
Select the Horn-fed Offset Cassegrain antenna from the 'Collection' and repeat the same process as above for this antenna. Select the design for operating frequency from the drop down and set the frequency to 50 GHz. Click on design and after inspecting the parameters click on estimate performance. Navigate to the estimated performance tab once the simulation has completed. The radiation pattern results are shown below.
![]() |
A clear difference between the radiation patterns of the two Cassegrain configurations is that the offset antenna has a large spillover not present with the regular Cassegrain. This spillover is due to the alignment of the feed. With the Offset Cassegrain antenna the feed is not aligned in the same direction as the primary reflector causing the spillover.
Below are the exported and combined radiation patterns of the two Horn-fed Cassegrain configurations.
![]() |
The benefit of the offset Cassegrain is the elimination or reduction of aperture blockage ratio by moving the feed out from between the two reflectors with the penalty of the added spillover. There are also other considerations when designing an Offset Cassegrain since the manufacturing tolerance is very small for certain components compared with the axis-symmetrical Cassegrain.
Design Horn-fed Offset Cassegrain Antenna for Gain and Feed Bandwidth
When designing just for operating frequency a gain of 38 dBi and -10db feed beamwidth of 30° is used by default for this antenna template.
In this section we look at the design option that allows the specification of gain and feed beamwidth in addition to the operating frequency. Start a new design for the Horn-fed Offset Cassegrain antenna. Select 'gain and feed beamwidth' in the 'Design for' dropdown. Let us increase the feed 10dB beamwidth to 35°, keep the gain at 38dBi and the frequency at 50 GHz. Click on the 'Design' button. Inspect the designed parameters and then click in the 'Estimate Performance' button. Give the simulation time to run and once it has finished navigate to the 'Estimated Performance' tab.
Below is a comparison of the 35° feed beamwidth radiation pattern compared with the previous radiation pattern that has a lower feed beamwidth of 30°. Note the increased spillover as the feed beamwidth is increased.
![]() |
Design Horn-fed Offset Cassegrain for F/D Ratio
It should be noted that this compact design would come with an increased manufacturing cost. Manufacturing tolerances will be very low for the placement and shape of the feed and secondary reflector in this configuration.
After inspecting the model click on 'Estimate Performance' and navigate to the 'Estimated Performance' once the simulation has completed. The results of the simulation are shown below. It can be noted that the radiation pattern is quite similar to and antenna with a large F/D ratio except for the spillover aimed in a different direction.
Conclusion
This application note shows the process of designing Horn-fed Cassegrain Reflector antennas with offset and axis-symmetrical configurations from their respective templates. These antennas offer a wide range of design parameter freedom and the user can select certain input parameters based on design specifications or limitations. We also note the differences between the different Cassegrain configurations highlight some of the benefits and trade-offs.